Page 22 of 25

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:29 pm
by Loki
Needs more Myriad's Tomb lol. Save that for SC2 plox. :3

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:29 pm
by Rising_Dusk
Yes, sir. :p

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:30 pm
by Intoxicated Crayon
Definitely could make a few mini games out of your magical world dusk lol.

Myriad's Tomb! ;o

Defend Janise long enough for her to defeat The Myriad!

Waves of Myriad's Forgotten of the Vale(?) and voidwalkers(Verte,Caliga, :p) constantly attempt to defeat you. It could be a crazy mini game lol or one of many like uther party... Bane Bonanza? Hallowed Ho-down. lol.

xD

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:33 pm
by Loki
Myriad's Tomb is more like Regicide/Exodus side of the spectrum.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:57 pm
by Rising_Dusk
Actually, I've already sort of planned Myriad's Tomb, I just don't have the patience to make it for WC3.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:11 pm
by Kurogamon
Yeah, Myriad's Tomb with good terrain would be an excellent addition to EotA: Exodus's genre. Better hope SC2 gives great freedom with skinning, a techy tomb is not gonna look good.

Is that avatar... Nova..?

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:40 pm
by Rising_Dusk
It is called a "Hero Defense / Hero Survival."
Kurogamon wrote:Is that avatar... Nova..?
Nope.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:24 pm
by Kurogamon
Hero Defense/Hero Survival don't reflect how epic something like Exodus is.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:48 pm
by SetaSoujirou
Like we need another map to divide Dusk's already expanded attention.
I'm pretty sure that's Zero Suit Samus.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:20 pm
by assassingao
Who created Dagurnott?

As far as I've know, it's the "Lord of Destruction"

It took little investigation to realize the origin of the monolith. It originated in a time before our own and owed allegiance to nothing we of the void would claim command over. He would play his part as enemy of all and work as a pawn of mine no matter his ultimate goals. As the Lord of Destruction, very little was needed to stir the titanic ancient to life again. Even if the Blood God himself cared not for such a creature, surely it could be driven to such lengths as to sway this war in my favor.
But who exactly is the "Lord of Destruction"? Exuro?

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:25 pm
by Kurogamon
"titanic giant" could be referring to "Lord of Destruction". Dagur is the Lord of Destruction, and as the LoD, he needs little power to be resurrected.

Depends how you want to read it. Could go either way.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:56 pm
by Loki
Dagurnott is an ancient. ie survived the great cataclysm. He's the cornerstone of the world like Arke is the world tree.
Since he's an ancient, this would mean that the "lord of destruction" persuaded him to join the Bane.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:32 am
by Rising_Dusk
Kurogamon wrote:"titanic giant" could be referring to "Lord of Destruction". Dagur is the Lord of Destruction, and as the LoD, he needs little power to be resurrected.
No. It should be quite obvious who the Lord of Destruction is.
Loki wrote:Dagurnott is an ancient. ie survived the great cataclysm. He's the cornerstone of the world like Arke is the world tree.
Since he's an ancient, this would mean that the "lord of destruction" persuaded him to join the Bane.
This is correct.

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:35 pm
by Intoxicated Crayon
Will there ever be or has there ever been an Anti Voidwalker that has significantly helped the Order?

Re: Lore Discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:05 pm
by Rising_Dusk
Of course there has. How in the world do you think Astelan slew Anick? :)