Diablo 3 discussion.

Post by **Loki** » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:09 am

I still believe that the female wizard looks too foxy to be a wizard. lol

Mako · Post by **Mako** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:29 pm

From another forum I'm on, we were discussing Diablo 3. Not surprisingly we were rather negative once this little bit came up...

"Speaking at yesterday's Diablo III Gameplay panel, Blizzard's Jay Wilson was asked one of the questions that's been hiding in the back of all of our brains, "Is Battle.Net going to remain free?"

His response probably wasn't what you'd want to hear. "We are looking to monetize Battle.Net so that we get to keep making these games and updating features," said Wilson. "We kind of have to." He went on to say that they do recognize that everyone loves having it as a free service, and that they don't have a strong desire to make a subscription-based game."

Although they say they don't want to... If this becomes pay for play like WoW I will not be getting this. Ever.

Two games I'm willing to pay money to play, and Diablo sure ain't in that pair.

pandamanar · Post by **pandamanar** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:22 pm

"You're a wizard, Harry"

mmm Teleport, Time Slow, Laser Beams... Boring... Couldn't they be more original than simply copying the Protoss race into a female magic wielder?

erwtenpeller · Post by **erwtenpeller** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:25 pm

the laser is a bit much and i dont like the look of time stop, the effect is interesting though.

Also, Asian magic chick looks awesome and hot and i want to be inside of her. And i want her to give me little shocks during sex like Elle from Heroes would...

hubba hubba...

Mako · Post by **Mako** » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:52 pm

I think that was just a tad much...

Seriously though, no one has any comments on the whole possibility of pay to play?

Glortex · Post by **Glortex** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:42 am

Blizzard + Pay to play Bnet = Loss of many customers.

Post by **shalnath** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:07 am

I'll be playing regardless. It's Diablo 3, people.

SetaSoujirou · Post by **SetaSoujirou** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:26 am

Too bad they ruined Starcraft 2, tough choice to make between the two.

Oxygen · Post by **Oxygen** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:13 pm

Lazer sucked, chain lightning had delay in between, I wish you could just chaincast it ( fixable perhaps with Fcastrate ) but the rest seemed interesting. Time stop may lack usefulness, althought it looked fun

andriejj · Post by **andriejj** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:46 pm

Oxygen wrote:Lazer sucked, chain lightning had delay in between, I wish you could just chaincast it ( fixable perhaps with Fcastrate ) but the rest seemed interesting. Time stop may lack usefulness, althought it looked fun

Timestop may be awesum against masses of ranged units ;P

Post by **Pigger** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:34 pm

She seemed to have a reflect-like spell too, if you watched the trailer.

Glortex · Post by **Glortex** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:01 pm

Yeah the reflect spell was combined with a time slow, It was so epic.

Post by **shalnath** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:10 pm

Are you sure it wasn't magic missile?

Post by **Loki** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:47 pm

It was a reflect spell inside the slow time. It was awesome. lol

Hell_Tempest · Post by **Hell_Tempest** » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:51 pm

She had other spells, as well.

And p2p b.net is going to shy away some people.

I want to be inside her

Valor & Zeal Gaming

Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.

Re: Diablo 3 discussion.